jhesch wrote:i realize that weight ratings are basically a function of flex number, and are relatively accurate, give or take a few pounds/kilos. just curious as to what significance this fact has to other previous posts? it seems most of the ideas presented so far still stand true..... are you disagreeing with certain posts or presenting discrepancies... just tryin to understand what you're trying to point out, if anything else besides the fact that weight ratings are somewhat arbitrary...
"Okay, so Bubka is what, anywhere from 190 to 200 lbs. He was jumping on 5.20 10 points, which are rated at 220 lbs. So he is basically jumping at 20 to 30 lbs above his weight. Now take the 140 lb vaulter and put him on a stick that is 40 lbs above his weight. I can promise that he will not get more blow off the top of his pole than Sergey. Personally, with no scientific evidence at all, I feel as though big poles return with more energy. The ratio doesn't seem to stay constant. The weight of a pole doesn't necessarily give you an indication of its return."
sorry, i think this is the one that i meant to quote. my point was to disagree with the fact that a bigger vaulter would get more pop out of a relatively smaller pole for them. the ratio may not stay constant according to the weight ratings because they are somewhat arbitrary. but a small vaulter and a large vaulter with the same speed, ability, etc. will get the same "blow" off of their pole.