golfdane wrote:joebro391 wrote:golfdane wrote:I somehow feel, that Nordwig is talking about the fly-away, and not the take-off. That Isaksson's technique offered that much more return from the pole, that the vaulters had to get used being catapulted over the bar and still maintain control on the top-end.
you still need to take off, to do a flyaway though. and it's pretty clear in the video that isaksson was taking off, freely. -6P
It's this phrase that puzzles me: "and also when the cross bar is still far from the grip point."
I agree, that Isaksson in many jumps appears to have a free take-off, but I feel Nordwig isn't referring to the take-off from the ground. I could be wrong though, but the crossbar has less relevance on the take-off (I sincerely doubt, that any jumper attempting to take-off freely feels, that they are significantly further away from the crossbar, and that this should somehow intimidate them in any way).
golfdane wrote:KirkB wrote:
(3) Courage to jump into the air even without the contact with the pole, and also when the cross bar is still far from the grip point. [KB: Wow! Free takeoff documented in 1973 by Wolfgang Nordwig! Altius, take note!]
I somehow feel, that Nordwig is talking about the fly-away, and not the take-off. That Isaksson's technique offered that much more return from the pole, that the vaulters had to get used being catapulted over the bar and still maintain control on the top-end.
6P and GolfDane ... I'd like to
try to clear up these misunderstandings. First off, here's Ganslen's question, and here's Nordwig's reply:
WHAT ARE THREE OR FOUR MAJOR FACTORS IN YOUR OPINION WHICH MAKE IT DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE VAULTER TO ACHIEVE SUCCESSFUL PENETRATION?
NORDWIG: Vaulting with a "suitable" pole. A too soft pole is good for a beginner; he can learn to feel the bending and the stretching. The pole gives him enough time. A too hard quick pole (rigid) destroys "the feel of the vaulting." (2) The vaulter must acquire the feel of jumping with the pole and not against it or in spite of it. (3) Courage to jump into the air even without the contact with the pole, and also when the cross bar is still far from the grip point. [KB: Wow! Free takeoff documented in 1973 by Wolfgang Nordwig! Altius, take note!]
I've omitted Isaksson's reply to this question, becuz Nordwig's reply is totally independent of Isaksson's reply. You both somehow mixed the 2 up, thinking that Nordwig's reply was about Isaksson's technique. It's too bad that we don't have a clear statement from Isaksson re free takeoff ... but (surprisingly) we still have a clear statement from Nordwig re free takeoff. Nordwig was talking about HIS OWN technique ... not Isaksson's.
At first glance, Nordwig isn't 100% guaranteed to be talking about is own technique. This is implied, as he was asked about "THE VAULTER", which might be construed to mean vaulters in general.
But I think it should be rather obvious that he's thinking about his own technique (Nordwig's own technique) when he replies. After all, Dr. Ganslen is querying these vaulters to get inside their heads ... to understand how THEY have become world class. So it's more probable that he's talking about (defending) his own technique rather than someone else's.
Sidenote: Nordwig's technique was distinctively different that Isaksson's in a number of ways ... from my personal observations.
You might also argue that Nordwig was only talking about his INTENT ... that he INTENDS to have the "
courage to jump into the air even without the contact with the pole ...". So Nordwig's statement doesn't PROVE that he had a free takeoff ... but I think it proves that he STROVE for a free takeoff ... just like Bubka STROVE ... or INTENDED ... to have a free takeoff.
Now re Nordwig's quote "
and also when the cross bar is still far from the grip point" ... this is confusing to me too ... but I don't think it changes the meaning of the first part of his sentence ... becuz he says "
and also ...". I think it's an additional thought that perhaps should have been written separately ... in a clearer sentence.
Does he mean when the "
cross bar is still far from the grip point" HORIZONTALLY or VERTICALLY? Nordwig didn't speak English, so there could be a problem in someone translating this for him. If the translator didn't understand Nordwig's technique, then he could have easily translated it incorrectly ... or at least too vaguely.
Remember that the crux of the question is about PENETRATION. So maybe he meant that it takes courage to penetrate in
towards the pit, instead of swinging more
upwards (less penetration). So if the bar was way higher than his grip (as it was when he set his WRs), then he might have reasoned that it takes courage to continue FORWARDS penetration, knowing that at some point you have to convert that forwards momentum into upwards momentum. This would match Nordwig's experience of using fairly stiff poles and not bending them much ... so the swing/penetration path of his CoM was more "direct-line-to-pushoff" than that of vaulters on softer poles (like me).
If he was referring to the HORIZONTAL distance between his grip and the bar, then it COULD relate back to being brave enough to PENETRATE without fear of stalling out (onto the bar - when there's quite a horizontal gap between the grip and the bar). But my strong suspicion is that he was referring to the VERTICAL distance of the bar above his grip.
Penetration is in the BOTTOM half of the vault, so I don't think he was talking about his fly-away ... or anything else in the TOP half of his vault. I think he was only talking about "
free takeoff" and "
penetration".
Maybe someone else has another way to interpret this?
Kirk