altius wrote:Two points -both made by Petrov a long time ago, may help to clarify this important issue.
First he stated "The plant begins with the first step of the run up" . This is a restatement of the totally integrated nature of his model but also reflects the fact that most Petrov/Bubka model athletes do begin a gradual lowering of the pole from its initial very high position , on the very first step.
However more important is his notion that the pole should essentially be in position for take off as the athlete moves onto the penultimate step. So by definition if the pole is not there at that point the athlete is 'planting' late -and this in turn suggests that they have started to move the pole into position for the take off too late -or to turn it around - not soon enough.
Finally remember that the 'plant' is only a means of moving the pole from an efficient carry position into an efficient position for an upspringing take off. One of the key indicators of the effectiveness of the Petrov Bubka model is that athletes who employ it effectively continue to accelerate through the last five metres while most athletes who do not tend to decelerate during that phase.
Thought for the day - perhaps even the week. "Wisdom can come from any place,from any time in history and in any language."
nice addition thanks