Search found 23 matches
- Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:40 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Beginning Technique
- Topic: Stride Length
- Replies: 25
- Views: 17359
- Sun Jul 01, 2007 1:14 am
- Forum: Pole Vault - Intermediate Technique
- Topic: What it takes to Break Records
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16463
- Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:59 am
- Forum: Pole Vault - Beginning Technique
- Topic: Stride Length
- Replies: 25
- Views: 17359
- Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:37 pm
- Forum: South and Southeast Regions
- Topic: dj's Training Center
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15287
- Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:41 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
- Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:26 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
Well, if you follow your point you could say that Pam Manson is the best technician or perhaps Joe Dial. Many would qualify for the title. However, there are no medals for that. The point of the discussion was to discuss the relevant efficiencies between Bubka and Mack. If you are looking for the s...
- Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:21 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
How do you know he wasn't trying to achieve a free take-off? You can't see his intentions on any video. I think this debate is becoming facetious. I apologize for that last comment, I was in a rush when I wrote it and it did not come out the way I wanted it to. Based on the Athens video, Mack did n...
- Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:17 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
After listening very closely to Tim's own words about what he was trying to do in his technique at the Olympics, and studying his film I would contend that by thinking, stay tall at the end of his run and be strong in his arms at takeoff, that what Tim was doing was moving towards the Petrov model ...
- Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:18 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
I find the interest in efficiency a bit distorted. Tim was 2 or 3 inches taller that Bubby - is that an advantage - well if you think improving pole ground angle is an advantage, then extra height must be. According to your free take off, Mack's height advantage is offset based on the fact that Bub...
- Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:19 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
you stated Tim put less energy in the system and recieved more back but how do you actually know how much energy Tim put in and recieved? KE can be found by taking ½ mv^2. According to the chart, Bubka and Mack had the same mass. Bubka, however, had more velocity into the plant which leads one t...
- Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:46 pm
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
- Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:54 am
- Forum: Pole Vault - Advanced Technique
- Topic: Bemiller/Mack Model
- Replies: 136
- Views: 75408
You are saying it is more effcient to run slower and use softer pole. I am a little confused as to how I am saying the above statement. You have completely misconstrued what I said. What I DID say was that Mack, who happens to have brought less speed into the plant, produced more energy out of the ...